

I got horribly lost in London today. I was accompanying a client to a pitch and admittedly our target was absurdly tucked away but… if I'd had a GPS enabled phone we wouldn't have walked in a huge circle!
I'm also sorely tempted by one of those 3G cards for my PowerBook (well the Vodafone one as they're the only ones to support Macs). GPRS via Bluetooth is ok, but rather slow. 3G data would make those delayed trains a bit more bearable but I'm not sure the Brighton area coverage is any good…
Yesterday afternoon I attended an excellent IPPR/TUC event discussing how Unions can benefit from using Internet tools. Discussions ranged from getting general secretaries blogging to paperless direct debits. A very useful and productive event for all that attended.
One issue that I found particularly interesting was exploring how the Internet could help leverage peer-to-peer member interactions. So instead of requests going up to a union rep (or higher) and then down again, web-based member directories (such as we build every day for alumni associations, corporate networks etc.) could empower members to find the right people instantly. This cuts out the middle-man and really lets members see the richness of their fellow union supporters.
This idea is scary to many due to the potential loss of control over member communications and data protection issues. These are both surmountable, however talking to delegates it became clear that the real stumbling block was fear from branches of letting centralised union bureaucracies have their membership data in the first place… a tough political nut to crack.
There's a write-up of the event (before it happened bizarrely enough) on PublicTechnology.net. Will Davies (from the IPPR) has a personal blog entry and an official entry with links to presentations, papers and so on. Roger Darlington's presentation was particularly passionate about the power of technology. It was only when I got home and pulled up his site that I realised I already knew who he was – bizarre.
Accelerated Democracy is a series of skilfully constructed (almost real) scenarios on how technology could radically alter the way we vote. (Thanks to Louise for the pointer that led to me finding this site)
The ever thought-provoking Clay Shirky has unleashed another of his essays. “Group as User: Flaming and the Design of Social Software” is an interesting analysis of social use of software and its implications in how such software might be best designed.
If you're a Mac user then you probably know and love at least one item of Panic software. Here's the story of their recently retired audio app, Audion. It's a great read.
I'm a sucker for cool looking visualisations (as Wired's InfoPorn section used to champion). Ones that are useful are even better of course.
Michael Gastner, Cosma Shalizi, and Mark Newman from the University of Michigan have distorted maps of the US according to state populations to give us a better idea of how the votes were distributed and it really is quite stunning.
Via WorldChanging
Like the election result this is totally unbelievable… Colour laser printers add microscopic traceable numbers to each print they deliver. This 'feature' is aimed at preventing counterfeiting. I just wonder what other kinds of printers, scanners, photocopiers have such undisclosed tracking systems?
Article on IT World via EDRI-gram
In other news an independent audit of the Irish e-voting system will be undertaken. It's not clear what will happen with the results or what kind of tests will actually be done. Still it shows how far the pressure has made the Irish government go to try and shore up confidence in e-voting.
Article in The Times via EDRI-gram
Now these guys really wanted to vote… that's dedication.
For a change from the US election fever, a couple of reports from Europe…
France has been taking a softly, softly approach to e-voting. Most recently they've piloted a system (developed by EADS oddly enough) for use in professional elections.
The E-POLL project has run a pilot in Italy and another is due in France soon. It's led by Siemens (where are the companies who know about voting in all these projects?!?!) and incredibly buzz-word compliant. I quote ” Its main concept is the re-engineering of the entire voting processes using cutting edge technologies such as wi-fi, intranet, smartcards, biometrics, and GPRS.” Great.
Boing Boing has two good posts on voting problems in the US of A.

Reader Brian Nicks had a bona fide error when voting with a DRE machine. And he even managed to snap the error with his phone camera and get a camera crew to film it. Nice. Link
Another reader, Kent Brewster, had a rather disturbing time when he asked to vote on paper (as he is allowed to do). The post says it all but it sounds like people choosing to avoid the electronic systems are being given an intentionally hard time. Link
A whole pile of US e-voting experts have started blogging on the US election.
I think they'll have a busy few days. I don't think there will any better place to watch how the technology of the presidential election performs.